Supreme Court sets aside dismissal of PDA employees over denial of fair hearing
Both outlets reported the Supreme Court's decision to set aside the dismissal and compulsory retirement of two PDA employees, emphasizing the court's ruling that the departmental proceedings were vitiated by the denial of a fair and meaningful hearing. The coverage was nearly identical in framing and wording, with no notable differences in emphasis or additional details provided by either outlet.
Summary generated by HarZaviya from the headlines and excerpts of the 2 outlets below. Each outlet's own headline is listed under it.
Same story from 2 outlets
Each outlet's own headline, most recent first — read any at its source.
-
SC sets aside dismissal of PDA employees over denial of fair hearing
The Supreme Court has set aside the dismissal and subsequent compulsory retirement of two Peshawar Development Authority (PDA) employees, ruling that departmental proceedings were vitiated by denial of a fair and meaningful opportunity of defence. A bench comprising Justice Rozi Khan Barrech and other judge(s) observed that the allegations relied upon against the employees were […]
-
SC sets aside dismissal of PDA employees over denial of fair hearing
The Supreme Court has set aside the dismissal and subsequent compulsory retirement of two Peshawar Development Authority (PDA) employees, ruling that departmental proceedings were vitiated by denial of a fair and meaningful opportunity of defence.
2 articles from 2 outlets, 30 Sep–1 Oct 2026. Headlines and links belong to their outlets — HarZaviya links out and never copies article text. What does % identical mean?